Showing posts with label chicago booth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chicago booth. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Booth Links

I'm snowed in with nothing better to do than share my favorite articles involving current/former professors.  Who am I kidding?  I would be doing this anyway:


  • THE NEW YORK TIMES.  Research by my Marketing professor, Ann McGill, and Sara Kim, a Booth Ph.D.   student, was featured in an article headlined “Feeling Powerful and Taking Risks,” published January 2.  In the study, one group of subjects was asked to recall a time when they felt powerful, and the other a time when they felt powerless.  Then the subjects looked at a picture of a slot machine, which had been rigged to look either human or nonhuman, and rated the riskiness of the game and their willingness to play.  The people who had been led to feel powerful were attracted by the humanoid machine and thought it lower in risk than the nonhumanoid machine, while the powerless people found the humanoid machine unattractive and risky.
  • THE NEW YORK TIMES.  My Advanced Investments professor, John Cochrane, was quoted in an article headlined “Fed’s Crisis Investments Are Showing Big Returns,” published January 10.  Interest income from the Fed’s investment portfolio has produced record profits for the Fed for two consecutive years, the article said.  But over time, when economic conditions improve, the portfolio could become a risk, because the investments could lose value when interest rates eventually rise.  “From the taxpayers’ view, I think it is a mistake to make much of this number either way,” Professor Cochrane said.  “The Fed is acting like a huge hedge fund on our behalf.  It is borrowing at very low short-term rates and investing in long-term government bonds, mortgages and other risky loans.  It made a profit on those investments last year, but it is bearing a lot of risk.”
  • U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT.   Research by my Managing in Organizations professor, Nicholas Epley, was featured in an article headlined “Close Relationships Sometimes Mask Poor Communication: People may think loved ones understand them better than they actually do,” published January 24.  “Our problem in communicating with friends and spouses is that we have an illusion of insight,” he said.  “Getting close to someone appears to create the illusion of understanding more than actual understanding.”
  • THE TELEGRAPH (London).  More research by Nicholas Epley was featured in an article headlined “Couples Sometimes Communicate No Better Than Strangers,” published January 21.  “Our problem in communications with friends and spouses is that we have in illusion of insight,” he said.  “Getting close to someone appears to create the illusion of understanding more than actual understanding.”
  • THE NEW YORK TIMES.  My Accounting professor, Christian Leuz, was quoted in an article about how Goldman Sachs’ purchase of Facebook shares looks like a way to circumvent a 1964 law that limits the number of shareholders in a private company.  “We’ve lowered the bar for certain types of investors that we felt need less protection,” Professor Leuz said in the January 5 article, referring to hedge fund and private equity investments.  “But maybe what we’ve learned in recent years after the financial crisis is that sophisticated doesn’t always mean high-net-worth.”
  • FOX SMALL BUSINESS.COM.   My Taxes professor, Ira Weiss, was quoted in an article offering advice to entrepreneurs seeking capital.  “Create an advisory board and use it for contacts,” he said.  “Try to get people interested in what you are doing and ask them for guidance.  Pitch your idea to industry experts.  Favor business models that generate cash sooner.  Get external validation for your idea.   The best way is through creating a product or service and securing customers that can be references.  Finally, bootstrap, bootstrap, bootstrap.”   The article was published January 4.    Professor Weiss is faculty director of the Hyde Park Angels, an angel investing group.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Thank You Professor Becker

“What I trust with the American people is that they have always had a lot of common sense. … And I think most Americans believe, and I think they are correct in that belief, that the private sector has shown that it performs better overall, not 100 percent, but…a lot better overall than the public sector does.”
-  Gary Becker 




Tuesday, January 4, 2011

To Sell Or Not To Sell

Everyone is entitled to their opinion when it comes to Groupon.com's decision to not be taken over by Google.

However, I agree with my Taxes professor, Ira Weiss, when he says:

"You can set up your own daily deal website in an hour.  They happen to have a lead on it, but if I were them I would have sold for that price."
It's true.  Daily deal websites are a dime a dozen.  Full article here.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Are Markets Efficient?

David Booth thinks so, as explained in this FT article.  I tend to agree with a lot of what he says, especially quotes like this:

“If you look in the mirror and you don’t see Warren Buffett, you’re probably better off in an index fund.”                 -David Booth 

Friday, October 1, 2010

Booth Links

The last post inspired me to share some of the other recent research and news articles I've enjoyed from current/former professors:



Research on Pay

My former Corporation Finance professor, Josh Rauh, along with Steven Kaplan, recently published some very interesting research on pay.  The link to the full study is here.

The most astounding sentence in the entire paper:

In 2007, it is likely that the top five hedge fund managers earned more than all five hundred S&P 500 CEOs combined.
The take on this trend taught by more than one of my professors at Booth is that due to technological changes and an increasingly interconnected world, these top hedge fund managers are able to scale up and apply their skills across a larger asset base.  This theory certainly makes sense to me, but the question remains:  Is it fair that these folks pay the capital gains tax rate on a large percentage of earnings and take 2 and 20 as their funds are appreciating but refuse to refund any principal if their funds blow up??